Why one must feel sorry for Kapil Sibal/Education system
One must feel
sorry for Union Human Resource
Development Minister Kapil Sibal.
When Sibal
became Union HRD minister, he brought a new thrust to the ministry at least on
the outset. He talked of expanding the number of education-providers, improving
the quality of education, giving autonomy to colleges/universities. But before
he could bring in that
much-needed change in the education scenario of the country, the party high
command thought Sibal’s calculation skills could be better utilised to
challenge (even if vaguely) the proficiency of the CAG in the infamous 2G
spectrum scam. So, he was given additional charge of Telecom Ministry by Prime
Minister manmohan singh (read SONIA GANDHI).
The next we
heard from Sibal was not on the issue of providing interest subsidy on educational loans
or abolition of Class X board exams. But on how the Comptroller and
Auditor-General (CAG) had been ‘utterly
erroneous’ in his estimation of a loss of Rs. 1.76 lakh
crore in the 2G spectrum allocation.
However, by
this time the 2G scam was being investigated by CBI under the supervision of
the apex court and A Raja’s involvement in the lapses was almost certain.
Reacting to
Sibal’s comment, Supreme Court
reprimanded him and asked the Minister to behave with ‘some sense of
responsibility’. Sibal’s reply could well have been: I am behaving responsibly.
After all, this is the responsibility that I have been assigned – to save
Congress’ face in the 2G spectrum scam.
But, Sibal cannot
not even do that. That is why we should feel sorry for him.
When CBI
arrested A Raja and Kapil Sibal was reminded of his comment that ‘2G allocation
had not caused any loss to the country’, the Telecom Minister had nothing to
say. He told media persons to ‘go and ask CBI’.
Now when he is
asked if he is a reluctant telecom minister, Sibal replies – If the prime minister (read SONIA
GANDHI) wants me to do a job, I do it.
Meanwhile,
public education system continues to languish. Statistics, that only half the
children of Class V can read Class II textbooks, is a shame for any government.
We cannot but feel sorry for the public education system.
REMINISCENT NOTE: Excerpts from Rahul Gandhi’s maiden speech in Parliament in 2006 that spun higher education dreams: “I walked to the children in village schools "Beta bade hokar kya bano ge?" The silent stare I got in reply disturbed me. In school after school, I have asked this question and got no answer.
Well.. Mr
Rahul Gandhi will go to villages and find out about the rotten education
system, only to use the anecdotes to pepper his speech in the Parliament.
Mr Gandhi, may
we tell you – your silence is more disturbing than the child who could not
answer: Beta bada hokar kya banoge?
Labels:
2G,
HRD ministry,
India education,
Kapil Sibal,
Rahul Gandhi,
Sonia Gandhi
Facebook Vs Wikileaks
Pick the odd man out - Vladimir Putin,
Barack Obama, Ben Bernanke, Mark Zuckerberg.
The answer may not be difficult to
guess: Mark Zuckerberg.
Now the similarity. All of them
including the facebook creator have been TIME persons of the year - 2007, 2008,
2009, and 2010 respectively.
Vladimir Putin, the man responsible for
bringing Russia back to the great game of geopolitics after it was almost
on the verge of becoming a failed state.
Barack Obama, who won a historic
American election to become the 44th President of the United States and
the first African American to do this. A year later he won the Nobel Peace
Prize (2009) "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen
international diplomacy and cooperation between people.”
Ben Bernanke, the Chairman
of Federal Reserve (the central bank of the U.S) who prevented an
economic catastrophe. In 2009, Bernanke hurled unprecedented amounts of
money into the banking system in different ways, which lay the groundwork for the
Fed's eventual return to normality.
It is here that one is forced to stop
and think before moving on to the next candidate in the list. Mark Zukerberg’s
online directory ‘Facebook’ that connects people through social network may
have blossomed beyond 500 million in 2010 with a movie, The Social
Network, made about the early days of Facebook. And it may be true that one
out of every dozen people on planet now has a Facebook account.
But, when seen in the light of
Zukerberg’s predecessors that the esteemed TIME magazine has honoured, his
contribution seems insignificant.
TIME Magazine's Person of the Year, is
the award given since 1927 to the most influential person in the world in that
year.
2010 was a year when Julian Assange
founder of whistleblower website WikiLeaks captured headlines of almost all
mainstream dailies around the world and his revelations were debated in
Parliaments of most democracies.
According to a report in the Canada
based The Gazette (Montreal) Julian Assange was voted top newsmaker of the year
2010 by senior editors at Postmedia Network newspapers and canada.com.
The social networking business
Facebook's core business is social networking – something that has
already been tasted and enjoyed by other players in the field.
Take the examples of AOL, Tripod,
Friendster, Orkut, MySpace or LinkedIn. You might have believed the same thing
about any one of those social networks as you do now about Facebook.
AOL was considered ubiquitous and invincible. And yet it saw its
downfall just like the other aforementioned social networks did. MySpace was
described as one of the most wildly successful sites in 2006 when it had
amassed 124 million profiles in its two and a half years of existence.
So it is wrong if we say AOL, Orkut or MySpace lost and Facebook
won. The more appropriate statement will be MySpace won first and Facebook won
next. And something else will follow.
Interestingly, Julian Assange won the most votes in TIME
magazine’s 2010 Person of the Year poll. While Assange was148,383 votes over
the silver medalist, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Prime Minister of Turkey, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg
came in 10th.
TIME’s
editor played safe by picking a less-controversial figure. However, the choice
itself became a controversy with numerous journalists and commentators alleging
that the magazine went with the safer choice, opting
for the 26-year-old billionaire over the
Australian hacker-turned-anti-secrecy advocate now
targeted by the U.S. Justice Department.
A TIME reader comments on TIME’s cover story of its Person of the
Year 2010 issue: “Guys, I’ve got a guy here working at TIME, who tells me that
Zuckerberg paid to get his face on the cover. He also tells me, things like
this are not unusual.”
Labels:
Facebook,
Julian Assange,
Mark Zuckerberg,
TIME magazine,
Wikileaks
'Obsession with politics blurs the vision'
Union Telecom Minister Kapil Sibal’s remark that ‘obsession with politics blurs the vision’, must not be looked only in the context that the minister assigned.
Kapil Sibal’s context – broadly on the opposition’s continued demand for a
Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) probe into the 2G spectrum allocation scam
and specifically on Arun Jaitley’s remark that the manner in which a
judicial probe into the 2G spectrum allocation scam was announced may invite
breach of Parliamentary privilege.
A little introspection into
Kapil Sibal’s own party in another recent episode will betray how obsession
with politics has blurred the vision of the Congress party too.
The Congress general secretary, Digvijay Singh’s claim that the
ex-Maharashtra ATS chief Hemant Karkare had called him two hours before 26/11
attacks to say that his life was in danger, is bound to shock anyone. Digvijay
saidthat his
initial reaction on hearing about Karkare’s death was, 'Oh God, they have
killed him'.
It may be another thing that
Hemant Karkare’s widow has accused Digvijay Singh of playing politics with her
husband’s death.
A little background about
Digvijay’s statement: Karkare was investigating the Malegaon bomb blast
allegedly carried out by Hindu extremists. Days after Karkare’s death, the then
minority affairs minister AR Antulay made an unsubstantiated statement: Karkare
could have been a victim of “terrorism or terrorism plus something”.
Rejecting Digvijay’s entire
claim, Kavita Karkare (Hemant Karkare’s wife) ascertained (on Dec’ 12) that if
her husband felt threatened by anyone, she would have known. She said that her
husband did not get any threat calls and Hindu extremists did not have anything
to do with the death of her husband.
Interestingly, the latest
disclosures by WikiLeaks point that secret cables sent to United States after a
month of the Mumbai attacks revealed, the United States thought that the
Congress ‘implicitly endorsed the conspiracy theory’ after initially distancing
itself from its own party man AR Antulay’s ‘completely unsubstantiated claims’.
And US reportedly feels that the Congress backed the conspiracy theory to
please Muslims.
There may be another reason behind Digvijay Singh playing the Muslim card
now. The Congress earlier this month appointed Digvijay Singh as in-charge of the party's affairs in Assam, a
state which has a high population of Muslims and no political party in the
state can think of forming the government without their support.
Now, the Congress party is
trying to distance itself from the party general secretary’s controversial
remark calling it the leader's personal statement. Had it been any other party which gives its leaders freedom to express
their views, it would have been easier to believe this. But not with the Congress.
In a significant revelation,
Ms. Kavita Karkare has reportedly denied that Digvijay Singh knew her husband
personally, contrary to the defense that the Congress later tried to put.
What is of more significance is Ms. Karkare revealation that during the
run-up to the Lok Sabha elections (2009), she was approached by political
parties who offered her money to speak to the media and make statements that
suited them.
Off course Ms. Kavita
Karkare was very clear and said, “no such questions would be entertained.”
Labels:
BJP,
Congress,
Digvijay Singh,
Hemant Karkare,
Mumbai attack
High on whitener, low on health
As the three kids entered the crowded bus in New Delhi railway station, the
conductor at once grabbed them for tickets. Their untidy clothes and blank
faces made him guess that they were ticketless passengers. The boys, ages 10 to
14, looked unaffected. They seemed accustomed to the rough handling. Closer
scrutiny revealed that they were in some kind of stupor.
The youngest who was bare-chested held his shirt close
to his mouth constantly inhaling from it. The eldest after the brief scuffle
with the conductor joined his partner taking out a folded handkerchief from his
pocket. It contained the intoxicant. All through their half-hour journey from
New Delhi Railway station to Nizamudin, they kept their pieces of cloths close
to their mouths. As if it was their life.
The other passengers in the bus
seemed unconcerned. One of the boys who felt that the effect had lessened took
out a white tube from his pocket and squeezed some transparent liquid on his
piece of cloth, quickly slipping the tube back to his pocket.
The tube contained whitener - a white
fluid used to erase errors in handwritten, printed papers. It is increasingly
being used by street children as an addiction. The addicts who are mostly
adolescents sniff it.
I could no longer hold myself and I enquired about
their whereabouts. The eldest who seemed their head called himself Yasin. He
said that he lived in Nizamudin in South Delhi
with his elder brother who was a rickshaw-puller. His two friends were his
neighbours. His voice was hoarse and manly unsuited to his age. And he spoke
with a lot of effort.
He revealed that the piece of cloth contained whitener
which they bought from Nizammudin. For the people living in the capital, the
sight of poor street urchins is not a very uncommon one. Many among them are
also aware of the addictions that these people get into very early in life.
What
is more worrying is that whitener addiction in juveniles is increasingly being
associated with crimes.
300% more harmful than alcohol
Inhaling the substance is many times more
harmful than alcohol, say health experts.
Dr Dnyaneshwari Patharkar of Go India Foundation says that inhaling whiteners is 300 per cent more harmful than regular alcohol because it directly affects the nervous system and hampers functioning of lungs, brain and kidneys.
Dr Dnyaneshwari Patharkar of Go India Foundation says that inhaling whiteners is 300 per cent more harmful than regular alcohol because it directly affects the nervous system and hampers functioning of lungs, brain and kidneys.
Interestingly,
the substance is not covered under the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances (NDPS) Act and therefore the police are finding it difficult to
tackle this menace. The police cannot stop it sale as it is a
stationery product that is easily available in the market. It is the
shopkeepers who have to limit its sale to students and office-goers.
A 15 ml bottle of
whitener along with a diluter of the same quantity costs around Rs 25-30.
Labels:
child addiction,
Delhi,
street urchins,
whiterner addiction
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
